What a cool story... The kid remembered from back when he was 8 years old.

Thanks for the link.

The Atlantic Monthly was first for sure - May, 1992 baby - http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/199205/mann

Why are you reporting that Felt was the #2 man at the Bureau? I was in the bureau at that time and believe me, Felt was not #2, #3 or #4. He wasn;t even in Hoover's inner circle. #2..........I am still wondering who came up with that one...

19 YEARS N THE COURTS-CONGRESS-SENATE-PRES., AND PROOF WHY FELT WAS RIGHT IN GOING TO THE WASHINGTON POST?

Richard M. Brayall
67 Garfield St. (401) 849-6077
Newport, RI 02840
May 26, 2005
FAX 1-202-456-2461
President George Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:
I received your letter in answer to my complaint about government officials (FBI) and judges covering up for Dart's (Tupperware) racketeering scheme for decades, nationwide. Your letter states that you are unable to intervene into court proceedings on matters not involving the Presidency/office. There are no court proceedings. For decades now, every law enforcement (FBI-IRS-FTC-Justice Dept.) agency, judge, Congress, Senate (here forth abbreviated government) have never intervened. While Dart and his affiliations inside the government (est. 4,000) robbed billions off the American Public. Dart victimized or injured thousands nationwide (see note below). Dart financed campaigns on both sides under different names with a criminal organization in place since 1949. There are no audits by the IRS or investigations by the FBI. Nineteen years later, (40) courts, (70) judges and still no one can intervene to ask or answer four words: "Who Was the Accountant?"

In 1986, Dart officials offered me a bribe ($200k) not to report their racketeering. I reported it to the Justice Dept., who wouldn't intervene. Dart officials threatened me with bankruptcy if I didn't cooperate through the use of the courts. I suffered a disabling double cerebral bleed of the brain. By 1987, I alleged Dart violated franchise-racketeering laws (admitted by FTC-Wall St. Jr. 11/14/88) nationwide. The FTC had my wife and I flown into to train FTC (FBI) agents on how Dart did the accounting and robbed Tupperware distributor accounts. How Dart concealed the fraud scheme for decades, collected state sales taxes without remitting them, laundered money, filed false tax returns, never issued 1099s in exchange for witness's silence. By the time we arrived, the FTC Director removed the accountants per the President. By Sept. 1989, I filed for Ch 7 bankruptcy. My wife and family moved to a house with dirt floors and got our food clothing from a shelter. By 1990, Dart then used the Brayalls bankruptcy to threaten thousands into signing franchise disclosure statements with releases for any wrong doings. In between I received death threats. By 1991, a USDC Judge took my discharged Ch 7 bankruptcy and dismissed it before I could testify before Congress. Another USDC Judge covered up the fact Dart robbed over $279,000 out of my accounts. Another USDC Judge gave me permission to serve 34 federal agents-judges has CO-conspirators to racketeering. The courts then switched the case between courts until it looked like I didn't file a timely appeal. By 1999, Brayall v US et al., state ordered injunction, bankruptcy, no agreement to end any litigation, $279,000 robbed, judges covering up for each other was erased from all books as a part of the ongoing cover up.

Dart's (50) attorneys knew they would never be prosecuted because of Dart's affiliations inside the government. That no one would intervene. So many judges/courts to ask 4 words? Proving repeatedly how Dart's criminal organization exists in the government. There are no statues of limitations. I would appreciate your reconsideration to order a grand jury, while I seek Congressional-Senate Inquiry.
Yours truly,

Note: Dart-CFO Rep. Party (1949-1983), Dart & Kraft, Cal. Rep. Party, Dart-Walgreen-Rexall Drug, pharmaceutical supplier to the government. (Vanity Fair July 1998: Dart put Reagon/Bush in the White House). Dart served as Dir. Tele-Satellite Communications (NY Times) for Reagon/Bush. See letters of Jan. 31st, Feb. 11th, Apr. 13. This case resembles US v. Keating. Except this is at every level in the government. Cc: Judicial Comm., Atty. Gen., Senate- Congress etc.

Richard M. Brayall
67 Garfield St. (401) 849-6077
Newport, RI 02840
April 13, 2005
2nd CERTIFIED MAIL:
President George Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. President:
I received your letter in answer to my complaint about government officials and judges' covering up for Dart's racketeering nationwide. Thousands were victimized, extorted and injured without protection because of Dart's affiliations inside the government (est. 4,000) See attached letters/1.

In 1986, Dart officials offered me $200,000 not to report Dart's racketeering to authorities. If I didn't cooperate, Dart would bankrupt me through the use of the courts/2. Duplicative complaints were filed in New York, Massachusetts and California/3. By 1987, I allege that Dart violated franchise (1969-90) and racketeering law nationwide. By 1988, the FTC admitted that Dart did not give franchise disclosures (16 CFR 436) since 1969 as required under the Truth & Lending Acts (Wall St. Jr., Nov. 14, 1988). The FTC had my wife and I (federal witnesses) flown to Cleveland to train FTC (FBI) agents on how Dart robbed the accounts, concealed the fraud scheme and laundered money without audit. By the time we arrived, the FTC Director removed the accountants per his superior. By Sept. 1989, I filed for Ch 7 bankruptcy. My family and I moved to a 4-room house with dirt floors. We got our food and clothes from a shelter. With ultimate power, now Dart issued franchise disclosure statements with releases from any liability. Dart used the Brayalls bankruptcy as an example (threat) to anyone who didn't sign a release for any wrong doings over the years, nationwide. Thanks to the judges and government officials that concealed the identity of the accountant or the FBI who wouldn't investigate Dart et al.

In 1991, Dart learned I was to testify before Congress. Dart then had a corrupt judge dismiss my Ch. 7 bankruptcy, 18 months later. Thus proving again ultimate power and corruption in the courts-government. By 1994, USDC Judge allowed me to serve 34 federal (FBI) agents/judges for co-conspiracy to racketeering. Brayall v. US et al. Not one judge had the courage to ask who did the accounting. In 1996, Dart admitted I only asked for the identity of the accountant. After 19 years, 12 years in 40 courts-70 judges, no one has ever asked who was the accountant/4.
A grand jury will end this. I hope and pray you will order this in the interest of justice and for the protection of the American Public.
Yours truly,

1/Justin Wedlock Dart Sr., CFO for the Republican Party (1949-1983); CEO Dart & Kraft; CEO for the California Republican Party; Dart-Walgreen-Rexall Drug; United Airlines, etc? Dart and others were known has the deepest pockets for campaign money. Because Dart robbed the American Public with government officials. See Vanity Fair- July 1998, Dart put Reagon/Bush in the White House. In 1986, Kraft spun Dart off after learning of Tupperware's racketeering to avoid liability.
2/Dart's racketeering centers on Tupperware's (DAS) Distributors Accounting Service. DAS did the accounting and was the accountant for the distributors worldwide ($2B annually). DAS made up false accounting sheets without work sheets. DAS concealed the fraud scheme and committed interstate robberies. DAS created a false debt. Has the debt grew, Dart would forgive the debt in exchange for the distributor's silence about the inside working of Tupperware. This covered up the crimes committed for decades. Dart never issued any IRS 1099's for the debt forgiven as required by law. DAS collected state sales taxes without remitting them to the states. Dart filed false tax returns and laundered 100s of millions without audit. Dart robbed my account by over $279,000. Dart knew any litigant would bankrupt before they were allowed due process. Dart knew that the judges would suppress evidence and the FBI would never investigate, because of Dart's affiliations inside the government.
3/By 1987, I suffered a disabling double cerebral bleed of the brain.
4/All violate the RICO statue that was originally written by Dart's archenemy, the Kennedy's. Dart was associated directly/indirectly to over 80% of the Warren Comm. Most of the Justices involved in this case actually know Dart.

Richard M. Brayall
67 Garfield St. (401) 849-6077
Newport, RI 02840
February 11, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL:
President George Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President:
I would like to help you with Tort Reform by asking you to examine the following cases. Brayall v. Dart Ind. Inc., (AKA Tupperware or Dart-TW) et al. (US Sup.Ct. Rept). In 1986, Dart offered me over $200,000 not to report Dart's racketeering to federal authorities. If I didn't cooperate, Dart and others would bankrupt me. For decades Dart used Tupperware has a front to launder 100s of millions a year without audit? Dart-TW did all the accounting for its 1400 franchisees. Dart robbed the accounts while creating a false debt. As the debt grew, Dart would forgive the debt in exchange for the franchisee's silence without issuing a 1099 as required by law. Dart also did not remit state sales taxes collected from its franchisees in each state between 1975-1998.

In 1987, I allege that Dart and others violated franchise and racketeering laws nationwide. (Wall St. Jr., Nov. 14, 1988- P-B1-Col.1). There were other complaints filed in California and New York with almost the same results has follows. By 1991, the corruption in the courts heightens in between Dart dismissing my discharged Ch. 7 bankruptcy 18 months later with a false $500,000 settlement offer. In between I was a federal witness with death threats where I was dropped before I could testify before Congress.

By 1994, a US District Court Judge gave me permission to serve 34 federal judges/federal agents for co-conspiracy to racketeering. Brayall et al. v. United States (FBI-federal judges) et al. The defendants then just switched the case between the appellate and district courts where it would look like a timely appeal wasn't filed. Not one judge had the guts to just ask who did the accounting? The case went on for over 11 years, 40 courts and 70 judges just to ask: "Who Was the Accountant?" In 1996, Dart filed the following opposition before the US Supreme Court:

Whether the petitions have failed to raise issues enduring or significance warranting the denial of a petition for writ of certiorari where as here, the petition is nothing more then an improper and unfounded attack on all the lower court judges (e.g. "claiming they made up false facts to support their false judgments" has an ongoing conspiracy to suppress the
identity of the accountant)?

Dart admits a relevant and material fact was suppressed in violation to the Constitution. For there are court rules and statues that forbid the above? Rule 11 sanctions attorney's unbecoming acts. Rule 60 forbids fraud upon the court. Rule 56 summarily dismisses a case or awards damages. There are rules for timely discovery. The first deposition wasn't taken until 5 years after the complaint was filed. Dart's attorney's (50) proved extortion through the use of the courts. These attorneys are still practicing law. Costing the American Public 100s of millions in judicial-investigative waste. Hundreds of millions in lost tax revenues, money laundering, interstate robberies. For decades thousands have been victimized, extorted and injured without protection.

I hope and pray you will investigate the above matter in the interests of justice and for the protection of the American Public. There are no statues of limitations in an ongoing criminal conspiracy/racketeering! I hope this will aid you in reforming a corrupt judicial system.
Yours Truly,

Richard M. Brayall
67 Garfield St. (401) 849-6077
Newport, RI 02840
January 31, 2005
President George Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President:
I would like to help you with Tort Reform by asking you to examine the following cases. Brayall v. Dart Ind. Inc., (AKA Tupperware) et al. (US Sup.Ct. Rept). In 1986, Dart offered me over $200,000 not to report Dart's racketeering to federal authorities. If I didn't cooperate, Dart and others would bankrupt me. For decades Dart used Tupperware has a front to launder 100s of millions a year without audit? Dart-Tupperware did all the accounting for its 1400 franchisees. Dart robbed the accounts while creating a false debt. Has the debt grew, Dart would forgive the debt in exchange for the franchisee's silence without issuing a 1099 has required by law?

In 1987, I allege that Dart and others violated franchise and racketeering laws nationwide. (Wall St. Jr., Nov. 14, 1988- P-B1-Col.1). There were other complaints filed in California and New York with almost the same results has follows. By 1991, the corruption in the courts heightens in between Dart dismissing my discharged Ch. 7 bankruptcy 18 months later with a false $500,000 settlement offer. In between I was a federal witness with death threats where I was dropped before I could testify before Congress.

Brayall et al. v. United States (FBI-federal judges) et al. By 1994, a US District Court Judge gave me permission to serve 34 federal judges/federal agents for co-conspiracy to racketeering. The defendants then just switched the case between the appellate and district courts where it would look like a timely appeal wasn't filed. Not one judge had the guts to just ask who did the accounting? The case went on for over 11 years, 40 courts and 70 judges just to ask: "Who Was the Accountant?" In 1996, Dart filed the following opposition before the US Supreme Court:

Whether the petitions have failed to raise issues enduring or significance warranting the denial of a petition for writ of certiorari where as here, the petition is nothing more then an improper and unfounded attack on all the lower court judges (e.g. "claiming they made up false facts to support their false judgments" has an ongoing conspiracy to suppress the identity of the accountant)?

Dart admits a relevant and material fact was suppressed in violation to the Constitution. For there are court rules and statues that forbid the above? Rule 11 sanctions attorney's unbecoming acts. Rule 60 forbids fraud upon the court. Rule 56 summarily dismisses a case or awards damages. There are rules for timely discovery. The first deposition wasn't taken until 5 years after the complaint was filed. Dart's attorney's (50) proved extortion through the use of the courts. These attorneys are still practicing law. Costing the American Public 100s of millions in judicial-investigative waste. Hundreds of millions in lost tax revenues, money laundering, interstate robberies. For decades thousands have been victimized, extorted and injured without protection.

I hope and pray you will investigate the above matter in the interests of justice and for the protection of the American Public. There are no statues of limitations in an ongoing criminal conspiracy/racketeering! I hope this will aid you in reforming a corrupt judicial system.

Yours Truly,

Nixon was my favorite President, So what if a Democrat office was broken into, to plant bugs, Politics is a dirty buisness on both sides, journalism is a little worse. Johnson Preceded Nixon and Carter succeeded Him with Ford thrown in for a couple of years, , It cant get any worse than Johnson and Carter.

Alex Butterfield told me that he had informed the FBI of the existence of the tapes nearly two years before he said so on TV at the Senate Committee hearing. Why did Hoover, Gray and Felt not spare the nation all the drawn out agony?
jack bridges

Watergate is all about the assaination of JFK. Larry O'Brian was DNC Chairman at the time.
They broke the DNC Office looking for JFK files.
Since, Larry O'Brian was Howard HUGHES Attorney after leaving The White House as domistic advisor to JFK.
NIXON was nerveous if Howard Hughes spiel the beans to his Attorney.
Howard Hughes was a member of the 5412 group organizes by the Vise president in 1954 by Richard Nixon.
The same players who partcipated in the Watergate break in are involved also part and parcle in the Assasination of JFK.
If Mark Felt was the Deep Throat he needs to a sunshine in our President death. Even a common criminal gets Justice including DNA testings and other. By the way Mr. Kennedy was shot from the Drainage from the ground up not from the top down.The trjectory doesn't match the official version. They shoud open the investigation.
The two outstanding jounalist should look into it. Specially, Mr.Woodward who was in the NAVY Intellegence.

Richard M. Brayall
67 Garfield St. (401) 849-6077
Newport, RI 02840 0
To: Congress and the Senate: June 20, 2005

Dear Sir/Madam:
In 1975, my wife joined Tupperware Home Parties, a div. of Dart & Kraft (hereforth abbreviated Dart). Between 1975-1981, she competed in sales with sales managers from every Congress-Senate district in the US to become a Distributor. Here a husband and wife are required by Dart to move to another state, invest their savings and assets for setting up a warehouse sales organization. Tupperware was a company of women singing songs, saying the Lord's prayer, trust, love, sharing and caring. By May 1986, we couldn't make the profits Dart officials stated distributors made nationwide. We told Dart officials we quit. Dart officials then showed us how we were in the top 10% for profits in the nation operating minus $60,000 a year. With a debt of $198,000 not paid for 2 years. Dart then sent us $300,000 of inventory as part of an ongoing settlement.

By 1987, Dart offered me a bribe ($200k) not to report the racketeering. I already notified the FBI who wouldn't intervene. Dart then threatened to bankrupt me if I didn't cooperate through the use of the courts. By May 1987, I filed a complaint and suffered a disabling double cerebral bleed of the brain. Duplicative complaints were filed in California, Massachusetts and New York. Dart violated franchise-racketeering laws (as admitted by the FTC in the Wall St. Jr. 11/14/88) nationwide. By 1988, the FTC had my wife and I flown into to train FTC (FBI) on how Dart robbed the distributors accounts interstate. How Dart and others concealed the fraud scheme, collected state sales taxes without remittance, laundered money, filed false tax returns and never issued 1099s in exchange for witness's silence. By the time we arrived, the FTC Director removed all accountants per the President. By Sept. 1989, I filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. My wife and family moved to a house with dirt floors and got our food clothing from a shelter. Dart officials then used the Brayalls bankruptcy to threaten distributors into signing franchise disclosure statements with releases for any wrong doings. In between I received death threats.

By 1991, a USDC Judge took my discharged bankruptcy and dismissed it before I could testify before Congress. In the meantime, two USDC Judges covered up how Dart robbed over $279,000 out of my accounts interstate. Another USDC Judge gave me permission to serve 34 federal agents-judges for racketeering. This was switched between the district and appeals court until it looked like a timely appeal wasn't filed. By 1999, Brayall v. US (FBI) et al., state ordered injunction, state court actions, Congressional-FTC Inquiry, bankruptcy, no agreements to end any litigation, $279,000 robbed, judges covering up for each other had been erased. Almost 12 years in 40 courts, 70 judges to ask four words: "Who Was the Accountant?" Because there were no audits for decades! Every federal agency, judge, Congress person-Senator, President wouldn't intervene. While Dart and his affiliations inside the government (est. 4,000) robbed billions off the American Public. Dart financed campaigns on both sides (since 1949) under different names so that no one would intervene. (See note below).

How could Dart's (50) lawyers know they could lie before all the (40) courts? Dart knew all the books and records would be erased. Dart knew the Congressional-FTC Inquiries would be shut down even with overwhelming evidence of guilt. Dart knew a USDC Judge would dismiss a discharged bankruptcy. Dart knew many judges would cover up interstate robberies committed nationwide. Dart knew state officials wouldn't investigate state sales taxes collected (in every state) and never remitted for decades. Dart knew false tax returns were filed for decades without audit or investigation by the IRS or the FBI. After twenty years in phony court (grand jury) proceedings, the above is still covered up which proves all of the above! After twenty years, I am still pleading for Congressional-Senate Inquiry. There are thousands waiting to testify against Dart et al.
Yours Truly,

Note: Dart was CFO for Rep. Party (1949-1983); Dart & Kraft; Cal. Rep. Party; Dart-Walgreen-Rexall Drug, and a principal pharmaceutical supplier to US. Dart put Reagon/Bush in the White House (Vanity Fair-July 1998). Dart served as Dir. Tele-Satellite Comm. (NY Times-Bohemian Club). All violate the RICO statue that was written by Dart's archenemy the Kennedy's. Dart was associated to over 80% of the Warren Comm. Most Justices actually know Dart. It's estimated that 50% of campaign money raised will come from the Far East, Europe and others.

SEE 7/2/05 WALGREEN DISCRIMINATION AT THE LAS VEGAS, NV BOULDER STORE AND PLEASE RESPONSE IN WRITING/EMAIL YOUR WALGREEN POLICY ON CARRYING LARGE BLACK PURSE INTO YOUR STORE TO SHOP WHICH I HAVE BEEN DOING FOR OVER 3 YEARS? IS THIS A NEW POLICY, WHERE IS THE POLICY POSTED IN THE WALGREEN STORE. MANAGER STEVENS COULD NOT PROVIDE A WRITTEN COPY OR SHOW ME THE POSTING OF THE ABOVE POLICY? THIS IS RACIAL DISCRIMINATION PROFILING. THIS IS URGENT AND IT MADE MY HEALTH CONDITION WORST, AGAIN, PLEASE WRITE/MAIL A COPY OF WALGREEN STORE POLICY/EMAIL.
SINCERELY, SHIRLEY PERRY, 5612 LITTLE LAKE AVE, LAS VEGAS, NV 89122 702 4312944.

Richard M. Brayall
67 Garfield St. (401) 849-6077
Newport, RI 02840
July 25, 2005

To: Congress and the Senate

Subject: Campaign Money, Organized Crime and a Dual Government.

Dear Sir/Madam:
Tupperware Home Parties, a division of Dart & Kraft (hereforth abbreviated Dart) and government officials robbed a billion dollars off the American Public. Dart was a corporate citizen- special interest protected in the courts in exchange for campaign (bribe) money. Dart and others created a corruption ring inside the (est. 4,000) government and the courts. The dual government made sure there was no government intervention, no media coverage while the statue of limitations ran. If anyone filed a complaint, the corrupt courts would bankrupt the litigant with the creation of complexities, delays and costs while suppressing crucial evidence.1/.

In 1986, I informed the dual-corrupt government of Dart's racketeering nationwide. The dual government said they couldn't intervene. By 1987, I filed a complaint. Dart's (50) lawyers argued the statue of limitations barred the complaint without a fiduciary relationship. Dart's lawyers knew that Tupperware's Distributors Accounting Service (DAS) was the accountant for all distributors worldwide. Dart's lawyers and corrupt judges knew that DAS robbed the distributor's accounts interstate, never remitted state sales taxes collected, filed false tax returns and laundered money for over 30 years. By 1988, the FTC admitted Dart violated racketeering- franchise laws nationwide (Wall St. Jr. 11/14/88). Later President Bush, who was financed by Dart, removed all accountants from the inquiry. By 1989, I bankrupted. By 1991, before I could testify before Congress, Dart had a corrupt judge unlawfully dismiss my bankruptcy. By 1994, a USDC judge gave me permission to serve 34 federal agents/judges for racketeering. Between 1991-1999, Dart used corrupt state/federal judges to cover up the fact that Dart was never audited for over 30 years. By 1999 all court proceedings ended. By 2001, dual government had to make sure all court records were erased or the above would link Dart to a corruption ring inside the government. By 2000-2003, Congress and others wouldn't intervene. By 2005, President Bush wouldn't intervene. A Congressional person notified the US Attorney, who couldn't bring a grand jury because of the statue of limitations. While someone is telling the media they can't print this story for it's in a phony grand jury, investigation or a protective order somewhere?

The statue of limitations is tolled for I received death threats, became disabled and laid low for years. Dart's criminal organization still exists within the government. Dart and others have changed corporate names while the statue of limitations ran to eliminate future prosecution or liability. I have never been charged for making false allegations for that would uncover all. I only asked: "Who Was the Accountant?" This letter is a matter of public record. After 20 years, as a whistle blower, I'm pleading for Congressional-Senate Inquiry or media coverage.
Yours truly,

1/Justin W. Dart was the CEO for the Cal. Rep. Party (1949-1983)-CFO Nationally, Dart & Kraft, Dart-Walgreen -Rexall Drug, principal pharmaceutical supplier to US. Dart made Presidents ever since Eisenhower-Nixon. Dart was associated with 80% of the Warren Comm., but never mentioned during Watergate. Dart put Reagon/Bush in the White House (Vanity Fair-July 1998). Dir. Tele-Satellite Comm. (NY Times-Bohemian Club)-Reagon/Bush. Most Justices know Dart. The above violates the RICO statue originally written by Dart's archenemy, the Kennedy's. Dart's scheme is being done by many outside the US. It's estimated over 50% of the campaign money comes from the Far East, Europe, China, etc. See Title 18 USC § 1961-1965-Racketeering, 201-Bribery, 1505-1510-Obstruction of Justice, tampering with a witness et seq. See Washington Post Blog: Brayall v. Dart- Deepthroat. (Continued on P.2-background).

Page 2 of 2. BACKGROUND:
1. In 1975, my wife joined Tupperware Home Parties, a div. of Dart & Kraft (hereforth abbreviated Dart). Between 1975-1981, she competed in sales with sales managers from every state to become a Tupperware Distributor. It's common knowledge that Tupperware was a company of women singing songs, saying the Lord's prayer, trust, love, sharing and caring with sales in the billions. To become a distributor, a Tupperware manager must trust Dart officials in setting up a distribution center. Here a husband is required to quit his job, join his wife in selling and warehousing. Dart requires couples to move to another state, invest their savings and assets in setting up the distribution center.
2. By May 1986, we just couldn't make the profits Dart officials stated distributors made nationwide. We told Dart officials we quit and to sell their distributorship. Only Dart can resell the distributorship to another couple. Dart had a thousand applicants waiting for years to become a Tupperware distributor. Instead Dart officials showed us how we were in the top 10% for profits in the nation operating minus $60,000 a year with a debt of $198,000 not paid for two years. Dart then sent us $300,000 worth of inventory as an ongoing settlement. Later Dart officials reneged on the partial settlement and refused to post payments. By December 1986, I said I was going to federal authorities. Dart officials then offered me a bribe ($200k) not to report the racketeering. Dart feared we knew too much about Tupperware's Distributor's Accounting Services, who did the accounting for the distributors worldwide. I had already notified the FBI who wouldn't intervene. Dart officials threatened to bankrupt me if I didn't cooperate through the use of the courts.
3. By May 1987, a law firm filed a complaint after finding duplicative complaints filed in Calif., Mass., and NY. Then I suffered disabling cerebral bleed(s) of the brain. Dart's (50) lawyers argued the statue of limitations barred the complaint for there was no fiduciary relationship. While Dart's lawyers knew that Dart/Tupperware's Distributors Accounting Service (DAS) did all the accounting and was the accountant for all distributors worldwide. Dart's lawyers and corrupt judges knew that DAS robbed the distributor's accounts, never remitted state sales taxes collected, filed false tax returns and laundered money for over 30 years. By 1988, the FTC admitted Dart violated racketeering laws. (Wall St. Jr. 11/14/88-PB1).
4. By 1988, the FTC had my wife and I flown into to train FTC (FBI) agents on how Dart and others robbed the distributors accounts interstate. How Dart concealed the fraud scheme, laundered money, collected state sales taxes without remittance, filed false tax returns and never issued 1099s for witness's silence. By the time we arrived, the President, who was financed by Dart, shut down the inquiry. While a US Attorney said to lay low for a grand jury, who disappeared. In between 11 different courts to ask who was the Accountant?
5. By Sept. 1989, I bankrupted. My wife and family moved to a house with dirt floors. We got our food and clothing from a shelter. Between 1989-1991, Dart used the Brayall's bankruptcy to threaten distributors nationwide with bankruptcy if they didn't sign a franchise disclosure statements which contained releases for any unlawful acts committed over the decades. In between I received death threats.
6. By April 1991, Dart had a corrupt USDC judge unlawfully dismiss the bankruptcy. Other USDC judges had to now cover up for Dart robbing over $279,000 interstate. No one dared to investigate Dart and others.
7. By April 1994, a USDC Judge gave me permission to serve 34 agents-judges for racketeering. Which was switched between courts until it looked like a timely appeal wasn't filed. I have never received that order.
8. By October 1999: Brayall v. US (FBI) et al., state ordered injunction, state court actions, Congressional-FTC Inquiry, grand jury, bankruptcy, no agreements to end any litigation, $279,000 robbed interstate, judges covering up for each had to be and were erased. The US Supreme Court denied writ of certiorari 5 times. Almost 12 years, 40 courts-70 judges to ask who was the accountant. Between 1991-1999, Dart used dual state/federal judges to cover up for no audits for over 30 years. By 1999 all court proceedings ended.
9. Between 1999-2005, I wrote to Congress and others who couldn't intervene or investigate the above.
10. By 2005, I asked President Bush to intervene, who said he couldn't intervene into court proceedings.
11. How did Dart and others know: (1) A FTC-Congressional Inquiry, grand jury or a US Attorney would disappear? (2) Dart's 50 lawyers could lie before 40 courts, 70 judges for almost 12 years? (3) A USDC Judge would dismiss a discharged bankruptcy? (4) State and federal judges would cover up interstate robberies nationwide? (5) State officials wouldn't investigate sales taxes collected and never remitted for decades? (6) The FBI-IRS wouldn't investigate false tax returns or interstate robberies for decades? (8) Escape liability for franchise fraud nationwide? (9) Cover up the above in phony courts, grand juries for over 20 years? 9. Stop media coverage for over 20 years?

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.